Editorial Policy

Our Editorial Mission

We build local prominence through data, not guesswork. The local SEO industry is flooded with outdated tactics. We cut through the noise. We test. We document. We publish.

Our goal is simple. We give you the exact mechanisms to improve your map pack visibility. We focus on proximity signals, review velocity, and NAP consistency. No fluff. No theory. Just operational reality.

How We Choose Topics

We cover what actually moves the needle in local search. Our topic pipeline comes directly from our daily agency operations. When we see an HVAC contractor in Phoenix drop out of the local pack, we investigate. We find the root cause and write about it.

We prioritize friction points. If a Google Business Profile update breaks existing Q&A formatting, we cover it immediately. We ignore generic marketing advice. We look at search data, client questions, and gaps in current industry documentation.

If a topic fails to directly impact relevance, distance, or prominence, we skip it.

Research and Fact Checking Standards

We refuse to publish theory. Every tactic we recommend has been tested on live client profiles. We verify ranking fluctuations across multiple geographic grids before calling it a trend.

Our fact checking process is brutal. We cross reference our findings with official Google documentation. We test claims against live SERP data. We use tools like Places Scout and Local Falcon to measure actual proximity radius changes.

If a strategy relies on grey hat manipulation that risks a profile suspension, we label it clearly. We never present risky tactics as safe bets.

We verify every claim before it hits our site.

Corrections Policy

Google updates its local algorithm constantly. Sometimes we get it wrong. When we do, we fix it fast.

If you spot an error in our documentation, email our editorial team at [email protected]. We review all claims within 48 hours. If we made a mistake, we update the page immediately.

We add a clear correction note at the bottom of the article. We detail what was wrong, what we changed, and when we changed it. Accountability matters.

Affiliate and Commercial Relationships

We run a profitable agency. We also use affiliate links for software we actually use in our daily operations. Tools like BrightLocal, Whitespark, and PlePer appear in our guides.

If you click a link and buy a subscription, we earn a small commission. This does not change our recommendations. We pay for these tools ourselves. We test them in real client campaigns.

If a tool fails to deliver accurate citation data, we drop it. We never accept payment to review a product. We never let software vendors dictate our content.

Editorial Independence

Our editorial team operates completely separate from our client acquisition side. No sponsor, vendor, or client can buy a favorable mention on this site.

We reject guest posts from link builders. We ignore PR pitches for unproven local SEO software. Our loyalty belongs to the practitioners and business owners reading our guides.

If a popular strategy stops working, we will call it out. Even if it upsets the industry.

Content Updates and Freshness

Local SEO rots quickly. What worked for map pack rankings last spring will get your GBP suspended today. We audit our core guides quarterly.

We track changes to Google proximity filters and review spam algorithms. When a major shift happens, we rewrite our affected content. We strip out dead tactics. We inject current, tested methods.

You will always see a last updated date at the top of our guides.

Stale data destroys local rankings.